Room-temperature superconductivity in ultra-thin carbon nanotube zeolite composites: a conventional or unconventional superconductor?
Chi Ho Wong, Rolf Lortz
arXiv:2509.21120 · 2025-09-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent report of signs of room-temperature superconductivity in ultrathin single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) of types (2,1) and (3,0) holds significant promise for energy applications due to their ability to conduct current without dissipation. However, the McMillan Tc formula fails to calculate their superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) accurately, which raises an important question: what is the pairing mechanism driving their room-temperature superconductivity? To explore this further, we first investigate whether the strong curvature of ultrathin CNT leads to exotic phenomena in unconventional superconductors. If no evidence of these exotic characteristics is found and the McMillan formalism indicates that it is not a BCS-type superconductor, could we be observing a new class of unconventional superconductivity that functions independently of phonons and typical exotic features? In this paper, we demonstrate that factors such as the chiral angle of CNT, boron dopants and lattice regularity can be used to tune the theoretical Tc to experimental values. Our finding suggests that combining CNT with a harder substrate could be vital for further enhancing Tc while minimizing lattice distortion under doping. We propose a reconsideration of the common belief regarding whether the McMillan and BCS Tc formulas are adequate for classifying materials as BCS or non-BCS superconductors.
Similar papers
First-principles prediction of high-temperature superconductivity in stretched carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.85Hua-Zhen Li & Xun-Wang Yan · 2026 · arXiv:2603.15305
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non Super-Cell SuperConductivity Of High Tc Materials
similarity 0.85Fredrick Michael · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3618
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic evidence for hot superconductivity in multi-walled carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.83Guo-meng Zhao & Pieder Beeli · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0509037
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the superconductivity of TiNCl and ZrNCl: A local bonding perspective
similarity 0.83Lukas Muechler et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.3099
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in two corrugated graphene sheets with intercalated CeH9 molecules
similarity 0.83Mohammad Amin Rastkhadiv & Meysam Pazoki · 2024 · arXiv:2412.09384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transition in quasi-flat-band superconductors
similarity 0.83A. A. Zyuzin & A. Yu. Zyuzin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified