Investigation of Parasitic Two-Level Systems in Merged-Element Transmon Qubits
Etienne Daum, Benedikt Berlitz, Steffen Deck, Alexey V. Ustinov, Jürgen Lisenfeld
arXiv:2509.22593 · 2025-09-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In conventional transmon qubits, decoherence is dominated by a large number of parasitic two-level systems (TLS) residing at the edges of its large area coplanar shunt capacitor and junction leads. Avoiding these defects by improvements in design, fabrication and materials proved to be a significant challenge that so far led to limited progress. The merged-element transmon qubit (''mergemon''), a recently proposed paradigm shift in transmon design, attempts to address these issues by engineering the Josephson junction to act as its own shunt capacitor. With its energy mostly confined within the junctions, efforts required to improve qubit coherence can be concentrated on the junction barrier, a potentially easier to control interface compared to exposed circuit areas. Incorporating an additional aluminium deposition and oxidation into the in-situ bandaged Niemeyer-Dolan technique, we were able to fabricate flux-tunable mergemon qubits achieving mean $T_{1}$ relaxation times of up to $130μs$ ($Q \approx 3.3 \times 10^{6}$). TLS spectroscopy under applied strain and electric fields, together with systematic design variations, revealed that even for mergemon qubits - despite their significantly reduced footprint and increased junction barrier volume - careful design considerations are still essential to avoid coherence limitations due to surface loss.
Similar papers
Mapping the positions of Two-Level-Systems on the surface of a superconducting transmon qubit
similarity 0.90Jürgen Lisenfeld et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.05365
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gradiometric, Fully Tunable C-Shunted Flux Qubits
similarity 0.89Benedikt Berlitz et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.26024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Projected dipole moments of individual two-level defects extracted using circuit quantum electrodynamics
similarity 0.88Bahman Sarabi et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1501.05865
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parasitic RF-SQUIDs in superconducting qubits due to wirebonds
similarity 0.88B. Berlitz et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.20458
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identification of Different Types of High-Frequency Defects in Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Leonid V. Abdurakhimov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Waveguide Bandgap Engineering with an Array of Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87Jan David Brehm et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.03330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified