Inverse proximity effect in thin-film superconductor/magnet heterostructures with metallic and insulating magnets
V. A. Bobkov, G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova
arXiv:2510.18102 · DOI 10.1103/2hdv-4b2x · 2025-10-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Proximity effect in thin-film superconductor (S)/magnet heterostructures with different types of magnets including ferromagnets, antiferromagnets and altermagnets is widely considered in the framework of an effective model, where the heterostructure is replaced by a homogeneous superconductor in the presence of a homogeneous exchange field of a corresponding type. Here we study the extent to which such a model is actually applicable to ballistic thin-film superconductor/magnetic heterostructures. In particular, a comparative analysis of thin-film superconductor/magnetic metal and superconductor/magnetic insulator heterostructures is performed. Metallic and insulating ferromagnets (FM, FI) and altermagnets (AM, AI) are considered. It is shown that in the S/FI and S/AI heterostructures the the proximity effect creates a well-defined spin splitting of the electronic spectra in the S layer. Thus, they are well described by the effective model. At the same time, the proximity effect in S/FM and S/AM heterostructures also creates a spin splitting of the spectra of the S layer, but it has a chaotic spectral and spatial distribution and unpredictable amplitude and, in general, cannot be detected via the spin splitting of the superconducting density of states. Thus, the effective model is not applicable to such heterostructures. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that they support well-pronounced triplet correlations and, thus, can be used for spintronics applications.
Similar papers
Inverse proximity effect in thin-film superconductor/magnet heterostructures with metallic and insulating magnets
similarity 0.92V. A. Bobkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Observation of the Inverse Proximity Effect in Superconductor/Ferromagnet Layered Structures
similarity 0.91R. I. Salikhov et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.4104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic proximity effect in superconductor/ferromagnet van der Waals heterostructures: dependence on the number of superconducting monolayers
similarity 0.90A. S. Ianovskaia et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.04227
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-sensitive Long-ranged Proximity Effect for Triplet Superconductors
similarity 0.90Gaetano Annunziata et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.3014
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Colloquium: Nonequilibrium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field
similarity 0.90F. Sebastian Bergeret et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.08245
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects and triplet correlations in Ferromagnet/Ferromagnet/Superconductor nanostructures
similarity 0.89Chien-Te Wu et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.1325
Source status unknown — claims are unverified