Depairing critical current density and the vortex-free state in FeSe nanobridges
Yue Sun, Yuling Xiang, Zhixiang Shi, Tsuyoshi Tamegai
arXiv:2511.19054 · DOI 10.1103/gqqr-q4nv · 2025-11-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The depairing limit and the vortex-free state in a superconductor is crucial for both the study of supercurrent related physics and the application eliminating noise linked to vortex motion. In this work, we report the evidence of depairing limit and the vortex-free state achieved by geometric constraint in FeSe superconductors. A series of narrow bridges with varying widths at the same location of a single crystal were prepared by the \textquotedblleft pickup\textquotedblright method using successive focused ion beam millings. By simply reducing the width of bridge, the magnitude of critical current density ($J_{\rm{c}}$) is enhanced more than one order, evidence the achievement of depairing limit. Moreover, in the bridge with a width smaller than the penetration depth ($λ$), $J_{\rm{c}}$ is found to be robust against magnetic field up to 1 kOe. The field-robust $J_{\rm{c}}$ is a strong piece of evidence for vortex-free state, which is created by the enhancement of lower critical fields due to geometric constraint.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 44 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Depairing critical current density and the vortex-free state in FeSe nanobridges
similarity 0.91Yue Sun et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Finite-size effect of critical penetration of Pearl vortices in narrow superconducting flat rings
similarity 0.89N. Kokubo et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.10753
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evaluating Superconductors through Current Induced Depairing
similarity 0.89Milind N. Kunchur · 2019 · arXiv:1907.00427
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boost of critical current density near quantum critical points in FeSe-Based superconductors with two superconducting domes
similarity 0.87Wei Wei et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.19050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Increase of critical current density in FeSe superconductor by strain effect
similarity 0.87Han Luo et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.19058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudo spin-valve switch based on ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet trilayer microbridge
similarity 0.87L. N. Karelina et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.00498
Source status unknown — claims are unverified