← Back to search

Study of fluctuation conductivity in YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$--$δ$ films in strong magnetic fields

E. V. Petrenko, L. V. Omelchenko, Yu. A. Kolesnichenko, N. V. Shytov, K. Rogacki, D. M. Sergeyev, A. L. Solovjov

arXiv:2512.09550 · DOI 10.1063/10.0007080 · 2025-12-10 · Low Temperature Physics

T1theoretical6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the effect of the \emph{ab}-plane magnetic field $B$ up to $8\,\mathrm{T}$ on the resistivity $ρ(T)$ and fluctuation conductivity $σ'(T)$ in YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$ thin films. As expected, up to $\sim 2.5\,\mathrm{T}$ the magnetic field monotonously increases $ρ$, the width of the resistive transition $ΔT_c$, and the coherence length along the $c$ axis, $ξ_c(0)$, but decreases both $T_c$ and the range of superconducting (SC) fluctuations $Δ_{\mathrm{fl}}$. The fluctuation conductivity exhibits a crossover at characteristic temperature $T_0$ from the 3D Aslamazov--Larkin (AL) theory near $T_c$ to the 2D fluctuation theory of Maki--Thompson (MT). However, at $B = 3\,\mathrm{T}$, the MT term is completely suppressed, and above $T_0$ $σ'(T)$ is unexpectedly described by the fluctuation contribution of 2D AL, suggesting the formation of a two-dimensional vortex lattice in the film under the action of a magnetic field. At the same time, $ΔT_{\mathrm{fl}}$ sharply increases by a factor of about 7, and $ξ_c(0)$ demonstrates a very unusual dependence on $T_c$ when $B$ increases above $3\,\mathrm{T}$. Our results demonstrate the possibility of the formation of a vortex state in YBCO and its evolution with increasing $B$.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers