On a recent explanation of the dynamics of the Meissner effect within the conventional theory of superconductivity
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:2512.16938 · DOI 10.1016/j.physc.2026.1354857 · 2026-01-04 · Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In Ref. [1], arXiv:2511.03384, Markos and Hlubina argue that "contrary to the expectations of Hirsch" [2] the conventional theory of superconductivity correctly describes the dynamics of the Meissner effect. Here I point out the flaws in their arguments that render them invalid, and propose an experiment to shed further light on these issues.
Similar papers
What holes in superconductors reveal about superconductivity
similarity 0.92J. E. Hirsch · 2025 · arXiv:2506.07361
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the physical significance of London's equation
similarity 0.89Jacob Szeftel et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.03330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the dynamics of the Meissner and the Becker-London effects
similarity 0.89Peter Markoš & Richard Hlubina · 2025 · arXiv:2511.03384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Meissner effect in superconductors: emergence versus reductionism
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2025 · arXiv:2510.17805
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Momentum of superconducting electrons and the explanation of the Meissner effect
similarity 0.89Hirsch, J. E. · 2017 · arXiv:1609.08451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch · 2011 · arXiv:1201.0139
Source status unknown — claims are unverified