Stability studies on subtractively-fabricated CMOS-compatible superconducting transmon qubits
Chawki Dhieb, Johannes Weber, Samuel Taubenberger, Carla Moran Guizan, Simon J. K. Lang, Zhen Luo, Emir Music, Alwin Maiwald, Wilfried Lerch, Lars Nebrich, Marc Tornow, Thomas Mayer, Daniela Zahn, Rui N. Pereira, Christoph Kutter
arXiv:2512.18037 · 2025-12-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Developing fault-tolerant quantum processors with error correction demands large arrays of physical qubits whose key performance metrics (coherence times, control fidelities) must remain within specifications over both short and long timescales. Here we investigated the temporal stability of subtractively fabricated CMOS-compatible superconducting transmon qubits. During a single cooldown and over a period of 95 hours, we monitored several parameters for 8 qubits, including coherence times $T_1$ and $T_2^*$, which exhibit fluctuations originating primarily from the interaction between two-level system (TLS) defects and the host qubit. We also demonstrate that subtractively-fabricated superconducting quantum devices align with the theoretical predictions that higher mean lifetimes $T_1$ correspond to larger fluctuations. To assess long-term stability, we tracked two representative qubits over 10 cooldown cycles spanning more than one year. We observed an average total downward shift in both qubit transition frequencies of approximately 61 MHz within the thermal cycles considered. In contrast, readout resonator frequencies decreased only marginally. Meanwhile, $T_1$ exhibits fluctuations from cycle to cycle, but maintains a stable baseline value.
Similar papers
Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors
similarity 0.89Amr Osman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measurement-induced state transitions in a superconducting qubit: Within the rotating-wave approximation
similarity 0.88Mostafa Khezri et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Statistics of strongly coupled defects in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88S. Weeden et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-beam annealing of Josephson junctions for frequency tuning of quantum processors
similarity 0.87Yashwanth Balaji et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.17395
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing
similarity 0.87G. Wendin & V. S. Shumeiko · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigating Errors on Superconducting Quantum Processors through Fuzzy Clustering
similarity 0.87Halima G. Ahmad et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.01815
Source status unknown — claims are unverified