Efficient flip-chip and on-chip-based modulation of flux-tunable superconducting resonators
Achintya Paradkar, Paul Nicaise, Karim Dakroury, Fabian Resare, Christian Dejaco, Lukas Deeg, Gerhard Kirchmair, Witlef Wieczorek
arXiv:2512.23119 · 2025-12-28
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate the efficient modulation of flux-tunable superconducting resonators (FTRs) using flip-chip or on-chip-based input coils. The FTRs we use are aluminum-based quarter-wave coplanar waveguide resonators terminated with 100um or 200um-wide square loop dc superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) employing 1um-sized Josephson junctions. We employ SQUIDs with a geometric loop inductance of up to 0.7nH to increase the flux transfer efficiency. The geometric inductance of the SQUID results in a non-zero screening parameter $β_L$, whose branch switching effect is mitigated by using asymmetric junctions. We achieve flux modulation of the FTRs by more than one GHz and flux responsivities of up to tens of GHz/$Φ_0$ with uA-scale on-chip currents. We compare flip-chip with on-chip input-coil-based flux modulation, where the former is realized through galvanically connected and closely spaced chips, while the latter is achieved through superconducting air-bridge connections. We achieve a flux-transfer efficiency from the input coil to the SQUID loop of up to 20%. Our work paves the way for efficient low current flux modulation of FTRs and sensitive measurement of flux signals.
Similar papers
Axion field influence on Josephson junction quasipotential
similarity 0.91Roberto Grimaudo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.15219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On Transmission Line Resonances in High T dc SQUIDs
similarity 0.90Urbasi Sinha et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.3187
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid stiffness of twisted multilayer graphene superconductors
similarity 0.90Abhishek Banerjee et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.13742
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Automated analysis of single-tone spectroscopic data for cQED systems
similarity 0.89G. P. Fedorov & A. V. Ustinov · 2019 · arXiv:1907.05198
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hot Carrier Thermalization and Josephson Inductance Thermometry in a Graphene-based Microwave Circuit
similarity 0.89Raj Katti et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.13379
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Volume dependence of microwave induced excess quasiparticles in superconducting resonators
similarity 0.89Steven A. H. de Rooij et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.07443
Source status unknown — claims are unverified