Enhancement of antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in UTe$_2$ under pressure revealed by $^{125}$Te NMR
Devi Vijayan Ambika, Qing-Ping Ding, Corey E. Frank, Sheng Ran, Nicholas P. Butch, Yuji Furukawa
arXiv:2601.02280 · DOI 10.1103/4gcm-mbl7 · 2026-01-05 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Characterizing magnetic fluctuations is one of the keys to understanding the origin of superconductivity in the spin-triplet superconductor UTe$_2$ which exhibits two superconducting (SC) phases (SC1 and SC2) under pressure: SC1 where a superconducting transition temperature of $T_{\rm c}$ decreases with pressure while $T_{\rm c}$ of SC2 rises with pressure. Previously, D. Ambika et al. [Phys. Rev. B 105, L220403 (2022)] have reported the possible coexistence of ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) spin fluctuations in UTe$_2$ under pressure from their nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. To delve the relationship between the magnetic fluctuations and the two SC phases, we have carried out detailed $^{125}$Te NMR measurements on a single crystal of UTe$_2$ with $T_{\rm c}$ = 1.6 K at various pressures ranging from 0 to 2.05 GPa. By comparing the temperature $T$ dependence of nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rates divided by temperature 1/$T_1T$ with that of the Knight shift $K$ for magnetic fields along the $a$, $b$, and $c$ directions, we evidence the enhancement of AFM spin fluctuations with increasing pressure. Based on the results, we suggest that FM spin fluctuations are more favorable for SC1 and AFM spin fluctuations are crucial for SC2. Our findings will inspire further study on this material to understand the peculiar SC phases in detail.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.8 | 1.05 GPa | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | 1.2 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetovolume Effect on the First-Order Metamagnetic Transition in UTe
similarity 0.93Atsushi Miyake et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.12118
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-lattice relaxation for point-node-like s-wave superconductivity in f-electron systems
similarity 0.93Shingo Haruna et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.10688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-Induced Superconductivity near the Superconducting Critical Pressure in UTe2
similarity 0.92Dai Aoki et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.01565
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic Anomalous Thermal Hall Effect in the Unconventional Superconductor UTe2
similarity 0.92Yukiyasu Moriya et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.11848
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic signatures of the electronic correlations in the electrical resistivity of UTe
similarity 0.92T. Thebault et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.15789
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of Nematic Fluctuations on Superconductivity in FeSeTe Revealed by NMR under Pressure
similarity 0.91Qing-Ping Ding et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.11732
Source status unknown — claims are unverified