Theoretical Prediction of optimal $T_c$ for Nickelate $\mathrm{La_{3-x}Sm_{x}Ni_{2}O_{7-δ}}$
Xiuqing Huang
arXiv:2601.06083 · 2025-12-30
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, the nickel-based superconductor $T_c$ record was updated to $96\ \text{K}$ in bilayer $\mathrm{La_{3-x}Sm_{x}Ni_{2}O_{7-δ}}$ (LSNO) under pressure, raising a critical question: Can its $T_c$ exceed the 164 K benchmark of copper-based superconductors? We find that both monoclinic and tetragonal LSNO have an octahedral quantum well structure (determining $T_c$) nearly identical to $\mathrm{YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7-δ}}$ (YBCO). Based on the formula $T_c = Λ/ξ^{2}$ (Planck ground-state quantum well oscillator hypothesis, $ξ$ = lattice parameter-determined quantum well depth), we predict Sm-doped nickelate $T_c$ values of $93.4\ \text{K}$ (monoclinic) and $97.1\ \text{K}$ (tetragonal), in excellent agreement with experimental data ($92\ \text{K}$ and $96\ \text{K}$). Notably, despite distinct composition and symmetry (LSNO: $P2_1/m$; YBCO: $Pmmm$), their $ξ$ ($3.6629\ Å$ vs $3.6720\ Å$) and $T_c$ ($92\ \text{K}$ vs $93\ \text{K}$) are nearly identical. This validates the proposed superconducting formula and unifies copper-based and nickel-based superconductors at the angstrom-scale octahedral quantum well. Further predictions indicate the maximum achievable $T_c$ for lanthanide-based nickelates (regardless of layer number) is $\sim100\ \text{K}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 96 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 93.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 97.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 96 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 93 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 83 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| La3-xSmxNi2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 96 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| KFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | 10.5 GPa | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 110 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TlBa2CaCu2O7+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 103 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TlBa2Ca3Cu4O11+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 112 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TlBa2Ca2Cu3O10+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 120 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 128 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 94 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 134 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 43 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 43 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 55 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TbFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 45 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| GdFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 53.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 52 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaFeAsO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaYFeAsO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 42 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaKFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CaKFe4As4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KCa2Fe4As4F2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 33 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K0.8FeySe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K0.8FeySe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 48.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsOF Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 43 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| SmFeAsOF Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 55 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsOF Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 42.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsOF Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 54.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 48.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Structure responsible for the superconducting state in La3Ni2O7 at high pressure and low temperature conditions
similarity 0.91Wang, Luhong et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2311.09186
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of superconductivity evidence in pressurized La3−xSmxNi2O7
similarity 0.90Qingyi Zhong et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-plane Ni–O–Ni bond angles as structural fingerprints of superconductivity in layered nickelates: Effects of pressure, strain, layering, and correlations
similarity 0.89Bipasa Samanta & Alexandru B. Georgescu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective bi-layer model Hamiltonian and density-matrix renormalization group study for the high-Tc superconductivity in LaNiO under high pressure
similarity 0.89Yang Shen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.07837
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure and its experimental examination: Comparison with La3Ni2O7
similarity 0.89Hirofumi Sakakibara et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical study on the possibility of high s-wave superconductivity in the heavily hole-doped infinite layer nickelates
similarity 0.88Hirofumi Sakakibara et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2407.21461
Source status unknown — claims are unverified