Superfluid Density, Penetration Depth, Condensate Density
Warren E. Pickett
arXiv:2601.10578 · 2026-01-15
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Fascination with the concept of superconducting (SC) {\it superfluid density} $ρ_s$ has persisted since the beginning of superconductivity theory, with numerical values of an actual density rarely provided. Over time $ρ_s$, addressed mostly in cuprate and following high temperature superconductors, has become synonymous with the normalized (unitless) inverse square of the magnetic penetration depth $λ_L$ (the London expression, with superfluid density denoted $n_s$), with interest primarily on its temperature $T$ dependence that is expected to reflect the T-dependence of the SC gap amplitude and gap symmetry. In conventional superconductors, generalized expressions from the London penetration depth via Ginzburg-Landau theory, then to BCS theory provide updated pictures of the supercurrent density-vector potential relationship. The BCS value $λ_{band}$ is distinct from any particle density, instead involving particle availability at the Fermi surface and Fermi velocity as the determining factors, thus providing a basis for a more fundamental theory and understanding of what is being probed in penetration depth studies. The number density of superconducting electrons ${\cal N}_s(T$=0) -- the scalar SC {\it condensate density} -- is provided, first from a phenomenological estimate but then supported by BCS theory. A straightforward relation connecting ${\cal N}_s(0)$ to the density of dynamically transporting carriers in the normal state at $T_c$ is obtained. Numerical values of relevant material parameters including $λ_{band}$ and ${\cal N}_s$ are provided for a few conventional SCs.
Similar papers
Microscopic free energy functional of superconductive amplitude and phase: Superfluid density in disordered superconductors
similarity 0.88Sudhansu S. Mandal & T. V. Ramakrishnan · 2020 · arXiv:2003.14354
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Density in Conventional Superconductors: From Clean to Strongly Disordered
similarity 0.87Surajit Dutta et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.06697
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of nonmagnetic impurities and subgap states on the kinetic inductance, complex conductivity, quality factor and depairing current density
similarity 0.87Takayuki Kubo · 2021 · arXiv:2110.00573
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS-like superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric compounds NbRe
similarity 0.86J. Chen et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.8375
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic penetration depth in single crystals of SrPdGe superconductor
similarity 0.86H. Kim et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.6054
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
London penetration depth in hole superconductivity
similarity 0.86J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified