Shunt-controlled resistive state of superconducting wires
Khalil Harrabi, Zain Alzoubi, Leonardo Cadorim, Milorad Milosevic
arXiv:2602.13456 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2026.3665479 · 2026-02-13 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The use of resistive shunts in superconducting electronics is vast and versatile, to dampen oscillations in junctions, stabilize switching behavior, aid current sensing, divert current during quenches, and protect both the superconductor and the circuit from damage. In single-photon detection by superconducting nanowires, the shunt is crucial for the timely relaxation of the sensor between the events to detect. Here we step out from the superconducting state and discuss the effect of the shunt resistor on the resistive state of a superconducting wire, at elevated currents still below the critical current for the transition to the normal state. We reveal how the shunt resistance controls the system dynamics and the onset of different resistive phases that include hot-spot and phase-slippage events. The accompanying dynamic current redistribution in the circuit also affects the local heating properties and additionally contributes to the control of the resistive state, particularly important at the elevated operation temperatures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Comparing energy dissipation mechanisms within the vortex dynamics of gap and gapless nano-sized superconductors
similarity 0.90E. C. S. Duarte et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.11547
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-carrying states in FFLO superconductors
similarity 0.90K. V. Samokhin & B. P. Truong · 2017 · arXiv:1711.06715
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mesoscopic field and current compensator based on a hybrid superconductor-ferromagnet structure
similarity 0.89M. V. Milosevic et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508544
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Framework for Sample-Specific Simulation of Superconductors for SRF Applications
similarity 0.88Aiden V. Harbick & Mark K. Transtrum · 2024 · arXiv:2410.20078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of superconducting nanowires shunted with an external resistor
similarity 0.88Matthew W. Brenner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave generation and vortex jets in superconductor nanotubes
similarity 0.88Igor Bogush et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.02946
Source status unknown — claims are unverified