Capturing nuclear quantum effects in high-pressure superconducting hydrides and ice with nuclear-electronic orbital theory
Logan E. Smith, Paolo Settembri, Alessio Cucciari, Lilia Boeri, Gianni Profeta, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
arXiv:2603.06906 · DOI 10.1073/pnas.2605545123 · 2026-03-06
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear quantum effects are essential for correctly describing hydrogen-rich materials at high pressures. Superconducting hydrides and ice are prime examples of such systems, requiring the inclusion of lattice anharmonicity and nuclear quantum effects to correctly predict and describe the structures and phase transition pressures observed experimentally. Herein, we show that the nuclear-electronic orbital density functional theory (NEO-DFT) method, which treats specified nuclei quantum mechanically on the same level as the electrons, is capable of accurately describing nuclear quantum effects in superconducting hydrides and ice. NEO-DFT predicts the hydrogen-bond symmetrization pressure in H$_3$S and D$_3$S, benchmarking against the more expensive stochastic self-consistent harmonic approximation (SSCHA) method, and predicts the correct symmetric Fm$\bar{3}$m structure for LaH$_{10}$ at a wide range of pressures. NEO-DFT also predicts the ice VIII to ice X phase transition pressures for H$_2$O and D$_2$O in agreement with experimental measurements. The accuracy, computational efficiency, and broad applicability of the NEO method opens the door for expanded large-scale studies into these types of systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 203 | 155 GPa | unknown |
| LaH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 250 | 137 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting hydrides under pressure
similarity 0.89Chris J. Pickard et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.00385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structures and Superconductivity of Hydrogen and Hydrides under Extreme Pressure
similarity 0.88Zihan Zhang et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.07238
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of ionic quantum fluctuations on the thermodynamic stability and superconductivity of LaBH
similarity 0.87Francesco Belli & Ion Errea · 2022 · arXiv:2206.07439
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quadrupolar phase transition in superconducting lanthanum hydride
similarity 0.87Abhishek Raghav et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2608.10428
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The quantum nature of the superconducting hydrogen sulfide at finite temperatures
similarity 0.87Ying Yuan et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.02348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Computational materials discovery for lanthanide hydrides at high pressure for high temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.87Evgeny Plekhanov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified