Metal Atom (Dis)Order and Superconductivity in YCaH$_{n}$ ($n=8-20$) High-Pressure Superhydrides
Masashi W. Kimura, Seong Won Jang, Nisha Geng, Eva Zurek
arXiv:2604.17712 · 2026-04-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
High-pressure superhydrides have attracted much attention due to their high superconducting critical temperatures ($T_\text{c}$s). Herein, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to study the structures and properties, including potential for metal atom disorder and doping-enhanced $T_\text{c}$, within Y-Ca superhydrides with YCaH$_{n}$ ($n=8-20$) compositions. For YCaH$_8$ numerous phases that differed in the arrangement of the metal atoms were found to be nearly isoenthalpic, suggesting the importance of configurational entropy on stability. The equimolar ratio of the two metal atoms brought the Fermi level to a peak in the density of states, enhancing $T_\text{c}$ to 149~K and 170~K for $P4/mmm$ and $Cmmm$ YCaH$_{8}$, respectively, at 180~GPa within the isotropic Eliashberg formalism. YCaH$_{12}$ was also predicted to be disordered, however the $T_\text{c}$s of the ordered variants spanned a wide range from 105-253~K at 200~GPa, showing that doping could either mildly enhance or drastically reduce $T_\text{c}$ from that of the parent compounds. For YCaH$_{18}$ and YCaH$_{20}$, only a single dynamically stable superhydride was predicted, which we attribute to the differences in the structures of the stable binary parents.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 203 | 150 GPa | unknown |
| LaH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 260 | 190 GPa | unknown |
| YH4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 88 | 155 GPa | unknown |
| YH4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 82 | 167 GPa | unknown |
| YH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 218 | 165 GPa | unknown |
| YH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 224 | 166 GPa | unknown |
| YH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 220 | 183 GPa | unknown |
| YH9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 243 | 201 GPa | unknown |
| CaH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 215 | 172 GPa | unknown |
| CaH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 210 | 160 GPa | unknown |
| ThH9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 146 | 172.5 GPa | unknown |
| ThH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 161 | 172.5 GPa | unknown |
| CeH9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 100 | 130 GPa | unknown |
| CeH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 115 | 95 GPa | unknown |
| YCaH8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 149 | 180 GPa | unknown |
| YCaH8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 170 | 180 GPa | unknown |
| YCaH12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 105 | 200 GPa | unknown |
| YCaH12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 253 | 200 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Stabilizing a hydrogen-rich superconductor at 1 GPa by the charge-transfer modulated virtual high-pressure effect
similarity 0.89Miao Gao et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.12320
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical properties of superconducting pressurized LaH
similarity 0.89Sabri Elatresh et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.06640
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductive Sodalite-like Clathrate Hydrides MXH with Critical Temperatures of near 300 K under Pressures
similarity 0.87Yuxiang Fan et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.00234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Discovery of High-Temperature Superconducting Ternary Hydrides via Deep Learning
similarity 0.87Wang, Xiaoyang et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.16558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full-bandwidth anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory and its application to superhydrides
similarity 0.87Roman Lucrezi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.00056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity up to 243 K in yttrium hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.87P. P. Kong et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.10482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified