Quasiparticle GW for Superconductors: Toward a Unified Treatment of Electron-Phonon and Electron-Plasmon Couplings
Catalin D. Spataru, Christopher Renskers, Elena R. Margine
arXiv:2605.21700 · DOI 10.1103/f8qb-2l59 · 2026-07-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting two-dimensional materials, and in particular few-layer graphene, offer an exciting platform for low-power electronics, yet the origin of their unconventional superconductivity remains an open question. Prevailing theories, primarily rooted in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) framework that assumes electron-phonon interactions are the main mechanism of superconductivity, struggle to account quantitatively for the observed phenomena. Recent studies point to a plasmonic pairing mechanism in graphene systems; however, disentangling the relative contributions of phonon- and plasmon-mediated pairing remains challenging due to the lack of a satisfactory first-principles framework capable of accurately capturing dynamical screening effects in the electronic channel. Here, we present a new theoretical framework that extends the quasiparticle self-consistent GW method to the superconducting phase by coupling it with the Eliashberg treatment of both phonon- and plasmon-mediated interactions. Our approach, termed superconducting quasiparticle GW (s-qpGW), is on par with the state-of-the-art Eliashberg theory of superconductivity when applied to bulk metals, and correctly predicts the absence of superconductivity in doped monolayer graphene. To differentiate s-qpGW from conventional Eliashberg approaches, we study a simple model system, graphene with an artificially enhanced density of states, and demonstrate that s-qpGW captures dynamical Coulomb screening effects in ways that standard BCS theory cannot.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electron - Phonon Superconductivity
similarity 0.91F. Marsiglio & J. P. Carbotte · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106143
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium dynamics of weakly and strongly paired superconductors
similarity 0.90V. Gurarie · 2009 · arXiv:0905.4498
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamics of Eliashberg theory in the weak-coupling limit
similarity 0.90Sepideh Mirabi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.02801
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Limits of Eliashberg Theory and Bounds for Superconducting Transition Temperature
similarity 0.90M. V. Sadovskii · 2021 · arXiv:2106.09948
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phonon-mediated spin-polarized superconductivity in altermagnets
similarity 0.90Kristoffer Leraand et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.08704
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Polarons and Bipolarons
similarity 0.89A. S. Alexandrov · 2008 · arXiv:0803.3666
Source status unknown — claims are unverified