← Back to search

Hole-doped superconductivity above 100 K in infinite-layer cuprate thin films

Biemeng Jin, Saurav Prakash, Zhaoyang Luo, Shengwei Zeng, Jing-Yang Chung, Xing Gao, Zhi Shiuh Lim, Jiangbo Luo, King Yip, Wei Zhang, Nurul Fitriyah, Shuhan Lu, Taiyu An, Ping Yang, Qian He, Silvija Gradečak, Huajun Liu, A. Ariando

arXiv:2605.29352 · 2026-05-28

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Since the discovery of superconductivity in (La,Ba)2CuO2 (Ref.~\cite{bednorz1986possible}), a broad family of structurally distinct cuprate superconductors has been proposed or engineered to elucidate the physics of high-temperature superconductivity~\cite{chu2015hole,plakida2010high}. Among them, the infinite-layer cuprate has the simplest structure, consisting only of the essential ingredients for superconductivity: CuO$_2$ square planes separated by spacer ions~\cite{siegrist1988parent}. Despite being proposed nearly 40 years ago, the hole-doped superconductivity via chemical substitution in this compound has not yet been achieved, a fundamental open question in the field. Here, we report the observation of superconductivity in the hole-doped infinite-layer cuprate thin film. Measurements of resistivity and magnetic-field response in Sr1-xRbxCuO2 single-crystal thin films show superconducting transitions with a high onset temperature of 100 K. Hole doping is achieved via the synergistic effect of rubidium substitution and apical oxygen incorporation, as evidenced by structural analysis and transport measurements. As the parent structure of the cuprate family~\cite{chu2015hole}, hole-doped infinite-layer cuprate provides a unique platform for revisiting key puzzles in cuprate superconductors~\cite{keimer2015quantum,tsuei2000pairing,armitage2010progress,dagotto1994correlated}, including strange metal~\cite{proust2019remarkable,taillefer2010scattering} and electron-hole symmetry~\cite{tohyama2004asymmetry,segawa2010zero,lee2014asymmetry}, while bridging to cuprate-nickelate symmetry~\cite{li2019superconductivity,zeng2022superconductivity,chow2025bulk,lechermann2020late}.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr1-xRbxCuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

100Pressure not reportedonset
Sr0.9Rb0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

75Pressure not reportedonset
Sr0.9Rb0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

23Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Sr0.9Rb0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

13Pressure not reportedonset
Sr0.9La0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

44Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers