Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations
Ezra Day-Roberts, Fabio Bernardini, Harrison LaBollita, Yi-Feng Zhao, Andres Cano, Antia S. Botana
arXiv:2606.00223 · 2026-05-29
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The observation of superconductivity in undoped infinite-layer nickelates $R$NiO$_2$ ($R$ = rare earth) challenges our current understanding and calls for a re-examination of the underlying electronic structure of this family of materials. In this context, it is particularly important to extend the investigation of $R$NiO$_2$ compounds from the intensively studied hole-doped regime to the almost unexplored electron-doped one. Here, we use a combination of density-functional theory and dynamical mean-field theory to study the evolution of the electronic structure of infinite-layer nickelates in these two doping regimes. We find a striking asymmetry in the self-doping of the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band due to the $R(5d)$ states: while this effect is strongly suppressed upon hole doping, electron doping instead leads to an increase in the size of the $R(5d)$ electron pockets, but without effectively hole-doping the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band. This asymmetry has an important impact on the magnetic response as antiferromagnetism is rapidly suppressed upon hole doping, whereas it remains the ground state upon electron doping. Despite these differences, electronic correlations on both sides of the phase diagram are dominated by the Ni $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital, suggesting that a single-band description may be appropriate for infinite-layer nickelates in both the electron- and hole-doped regimes.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Cuprate-like Electronic Structures in Infinite-Layer Nickelates with Substantial Hole Dopings
similarity 0.92X. Ding et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.07448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-electron and magnetic ordering effects in nickelates LaNiO and NdNiO: remarkable role of the cuprate-like band
similarity 0.91Ruiqi Zhang et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.05816
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Insulator-to-Metal Crossover near the Edge of the Superconducting Dome in NdSrNiO
similarity 0.91Yu-Te Hsu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.07783
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Induced magnetic two-dimensionality by hole doping in the superconducting infinite-layer nickelate NdSrNiO
similarity 0.91Ryee, Siheon et al. · 2020 · arXiv:1909.05824
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Application of Generalized Periodic Anderson Hamiltonians to the Superconducting Nickelates
similarity 0.91Abhishek Som et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.12472
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and magnetic correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor LaNiO under pressure
similarity 0.90I. V. Leonov · 2024 · arXiv:2401.07350
Source status unknown — claims are unverified