Microscopic equivalence of the vortex-entry current and the depairing current in a superconducting thin-film strip
Takayuki Kubo
arXiv:2607.11518 · 2026-07-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The vortex-entry current density $J_{\rm v}$ of a superconducting strip is usually defined, within phenomenological Pearl--London theory, as the current density at which the edge barrier for vortex entry disappears. In that approach, $J_{\rm v}$ depends on a short-distance core cutoff introduced by hand, and its temperature dependence cannot be determined within the same framework. To remove this cutoff ambiguity and determine the temperature dependence, one needs a microscopic calculation of the vortex-entry current. Nevertheless, such a microscopic calculation has never been carried out. Here, we formulate and solve this problem for an ideal homogeneous dirty-limit superconducting thin-film strip at zero applied field, with self-field effects neglected. Vortex entry is treated as the loss of local stability of the vortex-free current-carrying state. The calculation uses the fixed-current Gibbs functional of Usadel theory, which is valid over the full temperature range $0<T<T_c$, and examines both spatially uniform and nonuniform perturbations. The microscopic calculation shows that the condition for disappearance of the vortex-entry barrier is identical to the depairing condition. The central result is not merely that two current densities have the same value. The criterion for disappearance of the vortex-entry barrier and the depairing criterion are not independent conditions. Both identify the same loss of local stability of the vortex-free current-carrying state, namely, the same spinodal. Consequently, $J_{\rm v}(T)=J_{\rm dp}(T)$ for all $0<T<T_c$. This result determines the temperature dependence of $J_{\rm v}$, removes the Pearl--London core-cutoff ambiguity, and establishes the microscopic equivalence of the vortex-entry and depairing current criteria.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Microscopic theory of the field-induced instability of the vortex-free state in superconducting thin-film strips
similarity 0.89Takayuki Kubo · 2026 · arXiv:2608.04508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Moving Pearl vortices in thin-film superconductors
similarity 0.89V. G. Kogan & N. Nakagawa · 2021 · arXiv:2102.00073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thin superconductors and SQUIDs in perpendicular magnetic field
similarity 0.88Ernst Helmut Brandt · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Usadel equation in the presence of intrinsic spin-orbit coupling: A unified theory of magneto-electric effects in normal and superconducting systems
similarity 0.87I. V. Tokatly · 2017 · arXiv:1704.06451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Collective Oscillations in Superconducting Thin Films in the Presence of Vortices
similarity 0.87Mauro M. Doria et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9705080
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of two ferromagnetic insulators coupled by superconducting spin current
similarity 0.87Risto Ojajärvi et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.09959
Source status unknown — claims are unverified