← Back to search

Anomalous Microwave Response in YBCO Resonators beyond the Two-Level-System Model

Kaiwen Zheng, Nathan J. Johnson, Nathan T. Thobaben, Sidharth Duthaluru, Haochen Shen, Denae T. Cherry, David S. Wisbey, Kater W. Murch

arXiv:2607.27392 · 2026-07-29

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the microwave response of coplanar-waveguide (CPW) resonators fabricated from $\mathrm{YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ}}$ (YBCO) thin films over temperatures from approximately $70~\mathrm{mK}$ to $40~\mathrm{K}$. The resonators exhibit internal quality factors $Q_\mathrm{i}$ in the range of $4\times10^3$ to $10^4$ at 70 mK, which increase to a maximum of approximately $8\times10^3$ to $1.2\times10^4$ near $6~\mathrm{K}$. At low temperatures, both $Q_\mathrm{i}$ and the fractional shift of the resonance frequency $Δf_\mathrm{r}/f_\mathrm{r}$ increases with temperature, qualitatively resembling behavior commonly associated with two-level-system (TLS) defects. However, neither response saturates on the temperature scale set by the resonator frequency, and the loss exhibits no observable microwave-power dependence. We show that low-temperature frequency upturn may be better described by an additional paramagnetic response associated with defect-induced local moments or Andreev bound states, while the low-temperature loss follows an approximately logarithmic temperature dependence whose microscopic origin remains unresolved. These measurements establish the millikelvin performance of patterned YBCO resonators and show that their low-temperature response cannot be understood within the conventional TLS framework alone.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

87Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers