Anisotropic transport of Josephson vortices in atomic-layer superconductors on vicinal surfaces
Wenxuan Qian, Yash Chauhan, Ryohei Nemoto, Keisuke Sagisaka, Shunsuke Yoshizawa, Takashi Uchihashi
arXiv:2608.01196 · DOI 10.1103/b2j3-xj19 · 2026-08-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Atomic steps have strong influences on surface two-dimensional superconductors. Josephson vortices formed at the atomic steps under magnetic fields may dominate transport phenomena at low temperatures, but its experimental verification is still lacking. Here, we report the vortex transport properties of atomic-layer superconductor Si(111)-$(\sqrt{7}\times\sqrt{3})$-In with vicinal surfaces, for which Josephson vortices are directly observed by scanning tunneling microscopy. A sharp drop in resistance with decreasing temperature $T$, detected under out-of-plane magnetic field $B$, reveals a distinctive anisotropy with respect to the atomic step direction. The anisotropy of sheet resistance, proportional to that of vortex mobility, amounts to the order of $10^3$ at intermediate magnetic fields. In the high-$T$ and low-$B$ region, Josephson vortices exhibit thermally excited creep motions with anisotropic activation energy $U_\mathrm{act}$. A further increase in $B$ suppresses $U_\mathrm{act}$ toward zero anisotropically, resulting in one-dimensional pinning-free vortex flow at $0.10 \lesssim B \lesssim 0.20$ T. At the lowest temperatures, the vortex motion is governed by quantum tunneling. A $B$-$T$ phase diagram constructed based on these measurements reveals multiple regions characterized by directionally dependent vortex-transport mechanisms.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Si(111)-(73)-In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Observability of superconductivity in Sr-doped Bi2Se3 at the surface using scanning tunneling microscope
similarity 0.88Mahasweta Bagchi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.07794
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High- superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher in pressurized LaNiO
similarity 0.87Qiong Qin & Yi-feng Yang · 2023 · arXiv:2308.09044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Particle-hole symmetry reveals failed superconductivity in the metallic phase of two-dimensional superconducting films
similarity 0.87Nicholas P. Breznay & Aharon Kapitulnik · 2017 · arXiv:1712.00947
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear dynamics of vortices in easy flow channels along grain boundaries in superconductors
similarity 0.87A. Gurevich · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0205664
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic field-induced novel insulating phase in 2D superconductors
similarity 0.87G. Sambandamurthy & N. Peter Armitage · 2011 · arXiv:1109.4087
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Staircase-type magnetic-field dependence of the activation energy of Josephson interlayer vortices in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8
similarity 0.87J. C. P. Campoy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified