Superconductivity, pseudogap and marginal Fermi liquid in a relative-momentum-local theory
Jian-Jian Miao
arXiv:2608.09785 · 2026-08-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Cuprate superconductors host \(d\)-wave superconductivity (SC), a pseudogap (PG) with Fermi arcs and a strange metal (SM) with incoherent excitations and temperature-linear resistivity. These regimes emerge from the same doped Mott system but are usually described separately. Here a relative-momentum-local (RML) theory is constructed, with the exact spin-singlet Cooper representation of antiferromagnetic superexchange in the \(t\)-\(J\) model serving as a common thread. Pair correlations organize the low-energy behaviour of this Cooper channel into phase-coherent static SC, phase-incoherent quasi-static PG and phase-incoherent dynamic SM. A static RML prescription yields an exactly solvable PG Hamiltonian with nodal electron poles, antinodal gaps, resolution-broadened Fermi arcs and gapless charge-\(2e\) Cooper surfaces. A Cooper-surface Lifshitz transition generates logarithmic enhancements in the specific-heat coefficient and charge response without a spin singularity. The particle-particle continuum at finite centre-of-mass momentum produces Ohmic damping, while a dynamic RML prescription yields a one-loop self-energy with marginal-Fermi-liquid scaling. Spectral-weight transfer in the physical pair spectrum diagnoses the PG--SM crossover, whereas nonzero phase stiffness and global phase coherence identify SC. The RML theory relates single-particle, pair-sensitive and thermodynamic probes to three infrared organizations of one Cooper channel. A decisive experimental signature would be zero-energy Cooper-surface ridges in two-electron angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (2e-ARPES).
Similar papers
The pseudogap ground state in high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.91J. G. Storey et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.1884
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic approach to high-temperature superconductors: Pseudogap phase
similarity 0.91S. Sykora & K. W. Becker · 2009 · arXiv:0903.0921
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi arcs in cuprate superconductors: tracking the pseudogap below Tc and above T*
similarity 0.91J. G. Storey et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0707.1549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-Energies and Quasiparticle Scattering Interference
similarity 0.91Miguel Antonio Sulangi & Jan Zaanen · 2018 · arXiv:1806.01273
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent calculation of the single particle scattering rate in high cuprates
similarity 0.91Abolhassan Vaezi · 2010 · arXiv:1012.2764
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The pseudogaps in multiband electron-doped cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.90N. Kristoffel & P. Rubin · 2014 · arXiv:1409.0678
Source status unknown — claims are unverified