Identification and electrothermal modeling of persistent current switch operating regimes in a Siemens MRI magnet using external electrical measurements
Volodymyr Pupkov
arXiv:2608.15911 · 2026-08-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The persistent current switch (PCS) closes the superconducting loop of an MRI magnet. During ramping it is commonly treated as a binary element: with the heater on, the PCS branch is assumed effectively open; after heater turn-off, it is assumed superconducting. Field measurements with an MPS2 service power supply (Digit Systems) on a Siemens MAGNETOM Avanto show that the PCS remains electrically active and that its resistive state can persist after heater turn-off through Joule self-heating. Dedicated maneuvers identified two resistive regimes. With the heater on, the low-voltage resistance is nearly constant; after heater turn-off, self-heating produces a power-law voltage dependence. Both are described by a single effective electrothermal relation, $R_{sw}=C\,(P_h h+V_{node}^2/R_{sw})^a$, where $h$ is the recorded heater state, spanning a 690-fold resistance range. Final-hold data from 17 Siemens magnet sessions confirmed the voltage dependence of effective PCS resistance. Since branch-current relaxation follows $τ=L/R_{sw}$, the required hold time depends on switch state rather than a fixed delay; the median margin after source settling was $3.6\,τ$. The intersection of the PCS characteristic with the external-circuit load line defines the boundary of self-sustained resistive operation. For Avanto, the predicted 0.062 V threshold lay between superconducting recovery at 0.06 V and resistive-state persistence at 0.07 V, and retrospectively classified all 24 archived segments correctly. Including both PCS resistive regimes in the dynamic model reproduced the observed current redistribution: RMSE decreased from 1.449 to 0.154 A, a factor of 9.4. This improvement required explicit representation of heater state.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbTi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantum interference in asymmetric superconducting nanowire loops
similarity 0.81J. Hudis et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.17199
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dual relaxation oscillations in a Josephson junction array
similarity 0.81S. Mukhopadhyay et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.07829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of temperature in the magnetic irreversibility of type-I Pb superconductors
similarity 0.81Saül Vélez et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1105.6218
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Magnetic Persistent Current Switch at milliKelvin Temperatures
similarity 0.81Bob van Waarde et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1601.02439
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluorescent thermal imaging of a non-insulated pancake coil wound from high temperature superconductor tape
similarity 0.81R. Gyuráki et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.09302
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Using Abrupt Changes in Magnetic Susceptibility within Type-II Superconductors to Explore Global Decoherence Phenomena
similarity 0.81Stephen J. Minter et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.6901
Source status unknown — claims are unverified