Revised symmetry rule and intrinsically time-reversal symmetry breaking pairing in multi-orbital superconductors
Chang-Youn Moon
arXiv:2608.22902 · 2026-08-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the basic symmetry rule for the particle permutation in superconducting (SC) pairing states by examining the numerical solution of the linearized Eliashberg equation for Sr$_2$RuO$_4$. We find that the general multi-band, frequency-dependent SC gap function does not simply transform to itself up to the minus sign with either orbital ($\hat{O}$) or frequency ($\hat{T}$) exchange between two pairing electrons, contradicting the common assumption which has been used without verification. It originates from the fact that paring interactions are not invariant under the $\hat{O}$ or $\hat{T}$ operation, and is demonstrated to be essential to correctly interpret and understand multi-band SC states. One of unique properties implied by our newly found symmetry rule is the possibility of the complex eigenvalue in the linearized gap equation where the corresponding gap functions $Δ$ always have real and imaginary components both non-zero in real frequencies, inherently breaking the time-reversal symmetry. Our numerical results suggest the possibility of this unique pairing in a real material, Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, for which the Hundness of the material is found to play a key role. The revised symmetry rule not only leads us to more comprehensive understanding of the known SC states, but also opens new possibilities into exotic and unique states.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting Symmetries of SrRuO from First-Principles Electronic Structure
similarity 0.92Olivier Gingras et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.02527
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reconciling phase shift in Josephson junction experiments with even-parity superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.91Austin W. Lindquist & Hae-Young Kee · 2022 · arXiv:2210.00554
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying possible pairing states in SrRuO by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.91Shu-Ichiro Suzuki et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.09453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal Hall conductivity in the spin-triplet superconductor with broken time-reversal symmetry
similarity 0.91Yoshiki Imai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higher angular momentum pairings in interorbital shadowed-triplet superconductors: Application to SrRuO
similarity 0.90Jonathan Clepkens et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.00047
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Superconductivity in Sn/Si(111) driven by non-local Coulomb interactions
similarity 0.90Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07397
Source status unknown — claims are unverified