Competing Extended-$s$- and $d$-Wave Pairing from Distinct Spin-Fluctuation Channels in Stoichiometric $\mathrm{FeTe}$
Yichen Hua, Wen-lin Yang, Jian-Jian Miao, Hu Xu, Changming Yue
arXiv:2608.23467 · 2026-08-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent observation of superconductivity in stoichiometric $\mathrm{FeTe}$ raises the question of how pairing develops in this tetragonal 11-type chalcogenide once interstitial Fe is removed. We construct an experimentally constrained five-orbital tight-binding model from first-principles calculations and treat electronic correlations and pairing within the fluctuation-exchange approximation. The linearized Eliashberg equation yields competing extended-$s$- and $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave spin-singlet pairing instabilities. Near stoichiometric filling, spin fluctuations near $(π,0)$ and $(0,π)$ in the unfolded one-Fe Brillouin zone connect the $Γ/M$ hole pockets with the $X/Y$ electron pockets and favor an extended-$s$ gap that changes sign between the hole and electron sheets. Upon electron doping, depletion of the hole pockets shifts the dominant scattering toward the $X$--$Y$ channel near $(π,π)$, making the $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave state the leading instability, with nodal lines that avoid most of the Fermi surface. The relative strengths of the two pairing channels vary with filling and interaction strength as the dominant spin-fluctuation channel changes. Under matched interaction strength, temperature, and filling, the extended-$s$ eigenvalue is larger in $\mathrm{FeTe}$ than in $\mathrm{FeSe}$ throughout the range considered, while the $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave eigenvalue is also generally larger, particularly under electron doping. These results give concrete gap structures against which spectroscopic measurements of stoichiometric $\mathrm{FeTe}$ can be compared.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic and Superconducting Properties of Single Crystals of FeTeSe System
similarity 0.90Jinhu Yang et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.4758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The driving mechanism of the d-wave orbital order in the iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Da-Wei Yao & Tao Li · 2018 · arXiv:1806.08907
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory for superconductivity in (Tl,K)FeSe as a doped Mott insulator
similarity 0.90Yi Zhou et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.4462
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of electron doping in FeTeSe realized by Co and Ni substitution
similarity 0.90M. Rosmus et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.12530
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SO(4) FLEX+DMFT formalism with SU(2)SU(2)-symmetric impurity solver for superconductivity in the repulsive Hubbard model
similarity 0.89Sharareh Sayyad et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.05800
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeSe Thin Films Driven by the Interplay between Nematic Fluctuations and Spin-Orbit Coupling
similarity 0.89Jian Kang & Rafael M. Fernandes
Source status unknown — claims are unverified