← Back to search

Distinct Surface and Bulk Superconductivity in the Kagome Superconductor SrSn$_3$

Qun Zhu, Yong-Wei Wang, Ji-Hai Zhang, Qiang-Jun Cheng, Chen-Yu Hu, Jun-Zhong Wang, Qi-Kun Xue, Xu-Cun Ma, Can-Li Song

arXiv:2608.25271 · 2026-08-26

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Surface and bulk superconductivity may possess fundamentally different superconducting properties in quantum materials with nontrivial electronic structures, yet their superimposed spectroscopic signatures often prevent direct experimental access to each superconducting channel. Here we reveal, in epitaxial films of the kagome superconductor SrSn$_3$, distinct surface and bulk superconducting channels with markedly different superconducting gaps, upper critical fields, and vortex-core electronic states by tuning the tunneling junction resistance in scanning tunneling spectroscopy. The surface superconductivity is characterized by a thickness-independent superconducting gap and an enhanced upper critical field, whereas the bulk superconducting channel exhibits a larger superconducting gap that decreases with reducing film thickness and a much lower upper critical field. Within magnetic vortex cores, robust non-split zero-bias conductance peaks are observed exclusively in the surface superconducting channel, while pronounced zero-bias suppression is consistently associated with the bulk superconducting channel. These findings demonstrate that the vortex-core electronic structure depends sensitively on the underlying superconducting channel, providing new insight into vortex-bound states in topological quantum materials.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
SrSn3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers