Singular Weak-Field Thermodynamics of 2D Superconductors
Guopeng Xu, Chunli Huang
arXiv:2609.01602 · 2026-09-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a bulk 3D type-II superconductor, the lower critical field at which an isolated vortex becomes thermodynamically favorable is a size-independent material property. We show that the situation is different in 2D superconductors: the larger the superconductor, the weaker the field needed to create its first vortex. The lower critical field in 2D is always size-dependent. For a disk of area $\mathcal A$, the lower critical field $B_v(\mathcal A)$ scales as $\mathcal A^{-1}\ln(\mathcal A/\mathcal A_0)$ in the weak-screening regime and as $\mathcal A^{-1/2}$ in the strong-screening regime. We derive these results from an analytically tractable microscopic model that admits many-body wavefunctions for both the uniform and singly quantized vortex states in a magnetic field, and incorporate screening by coupling their long-distance 2D supercurrents to 3D Maxwell equations. These results motivate organizing the weak-field ground-state of a 2D superconductor in the $(1/\mathcal A,B)$ plane. The origin represents the zero-field thermodynamic limit and it is singular. Approaching the origin along the $B$ axis leads to an increasingly dilute vortex lattice, whereas approaching along the $1/\mathcal A$ axis yields the uniform vortex-free state. Our theory shows that every trajectory carrying fixed finite flux ultimately approaches the vortex-free state in the thermodynamic limit and provides a firm microscopic foundation for the weak-field thermodynamics of 2D superconductors.
Similar papers
Relaxation dynamics in type-II superconductors with point-like and correlated disorder
similarity 0.91Ulrich Dobramysl et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1211.6929
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of Superconductivity and Spin-Dependent Disorder
similarity 0.90Ravindra Nanguneri et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Langevin vortex dynamics for a layered superconductor in the lowest Landau level approximation
similarity 0.90W. A. Al-Saidi & D. Stroud · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex bound states of charge and magnetic fluctuations-induced topological superconductors in heterostructures
similarity 0.90Hossein Hosseinabadi & Mehdi Kargarian · 2019 · arXiv:1904.10003
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Making s-wave superconductors topological with magnetic field
similarity 0.89Daniil S. Antonenko et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.15266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Aspects of Localization across the 2D Superconductor-Insulator Transition
similarity 0.89Nandini Trivedi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.4769
Source status unknown — claims are unverified