Andreev scattering and Josephson current in a one-dimensional electron liquid
Ian Affleck, Jean-Sebastien Caux, Alexandre Zagoskin
arXiv:cond-mat/0001375 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1433 · 2000-01-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Andreev scattering and the Josephson current through a one-dimensional interacting electron liquid sandwiched between two superconductors are re-examined. We first present some apparently new results on the non-interacting case by studying an exactly solvable tight-binding model rather than the usual continuum model. We show that perfect Andreev scattering (i.e. zero normal scattering) at the Fermi energy can only be achieved by fine-tuning junction parameters. We also obtain exact results for the Josephson current, which is generally a smooth function of the superconducting phase difference except when the junction parameters are adjusted to give perfect Andreev scattering, in which case it becomes a sawtooth function. We then observe that, even when interactions are included, all low energy properties of a junction (E<<Δ, the superconducting gap) can be obtained by "integrating out" the superconducting electrons to obtain an effective Hamiltonian describing the metallic electrons only with a boundary pairing interaction. This boundary model provides a suitable starting point for bosonization/renormalization group/boundary conformal field theory analysis. We argue that total normal reflection and total Andreev reflection correspond to two fixed points of the boundary renormalization group. For repulsive bulk interactions the Andreev fixed point is unstable and the normal one stable. However, the reverse is true for attractive interactions. This implies that a generic junction Hamiltonian (without fine-tuned junction parameters) will renormalize to the normal fixed point for repulsive interactions but to the Andreev one for attractive interactions. An exact mapping of our tight-binding model to the Hubbard model with a transverse magnetic field is used to help understand this behavior.
Similar papers
Andreev scattering and Josephson current in a one-dimensional electron liquid
similarity 0.93Ian Affleck et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport across a normal-superconducting interface: a novel probe of electron-electron interactions in the normal metal
similarity 0.90P. Dolby et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010290
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spectrum of a Josephson junction with spin-split superconductors
similarity 0.89B. Bujnowski et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.07772
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Energy Transport across Topological Insulator Superconductor Junctions
similarity 0.89Jie Ren & Jian-Xin Zhu · 2012 · arXiv:1210.7551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductance enhancement due to the resonant tunneling into the subgap vortex core states in normal metal/superconductor ballistic junctions
similarity 0.89M. A. Silaev · 2007 · arXiv:0709.1548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection from non-centrosymmetric superconductors and Majorana bound state generation in half-metallic ferromagnets
similarity 0.89Mathias Duckheim & Piet W. Brouwer · 2010 · arXiv:1011.5839
Source status unknown — claims are unverified