Quantum Phase Transition in Extended Attractive Hubbard Model
S. Saito, H. Yoshimoto, Y. Y. Suzuki, S. Kurihara
arXiv:cond-mat/0002288 · 2000-02-18 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have made a variational analysis on an evolution of superconductivity from weak to strong coupling regime. In contrast to a crossover without thermodynamic anomaly found in a dilute system, we show the existence of a quantum phase transition near half filling. The transition is driven by charge density waves instabilities. We have found that superconductivity and charge density waves coexist in the presence of a weak intersite repulsion. The ground state phase diagram is determined and the quantum phase transition is an attractive version of the Mott transition.
Similar papers
Electrostatically induced phase transitions in superconducting complex oxides
similarity 0.89Li Han & C. A. R. Sá de Melo · 2009 · arXiv:0908.2011
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder Effects in BCS-BEC Crossover Region of Attractive Hubbard Model
similarity 0.89E. Z. Kuchinskii et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.5603
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity on a Quasiperiodic Lattice: Extended-to-Localized Crossover of Cooper Pairs
similarity 0.88Shiro Sakai et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.07210
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
"Superconductor"-insulator transitions in a Hubbard chain with nearest- neighbor and bond-charge interactions
similarity 0.88A. A. Aligia & E. R. Gagliano · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9712190
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossover of superconducting properties and kinetic-energy gain in two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.88Hisatoshi Yokoyama et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergent superconductivity upon disordering a charge density wave ground state
similarity 0.88Anurag Banerjee et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.06568
Source status unknown — claims are unverified