Does Giant Magnetoresistance Survive in Presence of Superconducting Contact?
N. Ryzhanova, C. Lacroix, A. Vedyayev, D. Bagrets, B. Dieny
arXiv:cond-mat/0002411 · DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/13/18/310 · 2000-02-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The giant magnetoresistance (GMR) of ferromagnetic bilayers with a superconducting contact (F1/F2/S) is calculated in ballistic and diffusive regimes. As in spin-valve, it is assumed that the magnetization in the two ferromagnetic layers F1 and F2 can be changed from parallel to antiparallel. It is shown that the GMR defined as the change of conductance between the two magnetic configurations is an oscillatory function of the thickness of F2 layer and tends to an asymptotic positive value at large thickness. This is due to the formation of quantum well states in F2 induced by Andreev reflection at the F2/S interface and reflection at F1/F2 interface in antiparallel configuration. In the diffusive regime, if only spin-dependent scattering rates in the magnetic layers are considered (no difference in Fermi wave-vectors between spin up and down electrons) then the GMR is supressed due to the mixing of spin up and down electron-hole channels by Andreev reflection.
Similar papers
Electronic transport through ferromagnetic and superconducting junctions with spin-filter tunneling barriers
similarity 0.90F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1211.0870
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of Giant Magnetoresistance by a superconducting contact
similarity 0.89F. Taddei et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9901347
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.88F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011425
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of interactions in the energy of the spin resonance peak in Fe-based superconductors
similarity 0.88Yu. N. Togushova & M. M. Korshunov · 2019 · arXiv:1907.08133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of the Josephson current by an exchange field in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.88F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102012
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The influence of spin-dependent phases of tunneling electrons on the conductance of a point ferromagnet/isolator/superconductor contact
similarity 0.88B. P. Vodopyanov · 2008 · arXiv:0803.2499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified