Comparison of flux creep an nonlinear E-j approach for analysis of vortex motion in superconductors
D. V. Shantsev, A. V. Bobyl, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen
arXiv:cond-mat/0003396 · 2000-03-24 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two commonly accepted approaches for simulations of thermally-activated vortex motion in superconductors are compared. These are (i) the so-called flux creep approach based on the expression E=vB relating the electric field E to the velocity v of the thermally-activated flux motion and the local flux density B, and (ii) the approach employing a phenomenological nonlinear current-voltage curve, E(j). Our results show that the two approaches give similar but also distinctly different behaviors for the distributions of current and flux density in both a long slab and thin strip geometry. The differences are most pronounced where the local B is small. Magneto-optical imaging of a YBaCuO thin film carrying a transport current was performed to compare the simulations with experimental behavior. It is shown that the flux creep approach describes the experiments far better than simulations based on the E(j) approach.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBaCuO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Flux creep in superconducting films: An exact solution
similarity 0.88Alexander Gurevich & Ernst Helmut Brandt
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universality of Flux Creep in Superconductors with Arbitrary Shape and Current-Voltage Law
similarity 0.87Ernst Helmut Brandt
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling and exact solutions for the flux creep problem in a slab superconductor
similarity 0.87D. V. Shantsev et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108049
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux penetration, matching effect, and hysteresis in homogeneous superconducting films
similarity 0.86C. C. de Souza Silva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Visualization of Current-Driven Vortex Formation in High- Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.86Shunsuke Nishimura et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.19896
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of electric field distributions in superconductors via magneto-optical imaging and the Faraday law
similarity 0.86Ch. Jooss & V. Born
Source status unknown — claims are unverified