← Back to search

Comparison of flux creep an nonlinear E-j approach for analysis of vortex motion in superconductors

D. V. Shantsev, A. V. Bobyl, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen

arXiv:cond-mat/0003396 · 2000-03-24 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T31 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Two commonly accepted approaches for simulations of thermally-activated vortex motion in superconductors are compared. These are (i) the so-called flux creep approach based on the expression E=vB relating the electric field E to the velocity v of the thermally-activated flux motion and the local flux density B, and (ii) the approach employing a phenomenological nonlinear current-voltage curve, E(j). Our results show that the two approaches give similar but also distinctly different behaviors for the distributions of current and flux density in both a long slab and thin strip geometry. The differences are most pronounced where the local B is small. Magneto-optical imaging of a YBaCuO thin film carrying a transport current was performed to compare the simulations with experimental behavior. It is shown that the flux creep approach describes the experiments far better than simulations based on the E(j) approach.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBaCuO

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers