Two energy gaps in cuprates: pairing and coherence gaps: The interpretation of tunneling and inelastic neutron scattering measurements
A. Mourachkine
arXiv:cond-mat/0006090 · DOI 10.1016/S0921-4534(00)00734-6 · 2000-06-06 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Tunneling and inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements in cuprates are discussed. There is a clear discrepancy among energy-gap values for different 90 K cuprates, inferred from tunneling measurements. By using the phase diagram of hole-doped cuprates we interpret tunneling measurements in 90 K cuprates and INS data in YBCO.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Incoherent pair tunneling in the pseudogap phase of cuprates
similarity 0.90T. Micklitz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two energy gaps observed in tunneling measurements on hole-doped cuprates: pairing gap and coherent gap
similarity 0.89A. Mourachkine · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906358
Source status unknown — claims are unverified