Spin-Peierls Dimerization of a s=1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a Square Lattice
Aiman Al-Omari
arXiv:cond-mat/0006182 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.69.3387 · 2000-06-11 · Tokyo Sugaku Kaisya Zasshi
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Dimerization of a spin-half Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice is investigated for several possible dimerized configurations, some of which are shown to have lower ground state energies than the others. In particular, the lattice deformations resulting in alternate stronger and weaker couplings along both the principal axes of a square lattice are shown to result in a larger gain in magnetic energy. In addition, a `columnar' configuration is shown to have a lower ground state energy and a faster increase in the energy gap parameter than a `staggered' configuration. The inclusion of unexpanded exchange coupling leads to a power law behaviour for the magnetic energy gain and energy gap, which is qualitatively different from that reported earlier. Instead of increasing as $δ^{x}$, the two quantities depend on $δ$ as $δ^ν/| \ln δ| .$ This is true both in the near critical regime $(0\leq δ\leq 0.1)$ as well as in the far regime $(0\leq δ<1)$. It is suggested that the unexpanded exchange coupling is as much a source of the logarithmic dependence as a correction due to the contribution of umklapp processes. Staggered magnetization is shown to follow the same $δ$-dependence in all the configurations in the small $δ$-regime, while for $0\leq δ<1$, it follows the power law $δ^{x}$.
Similar papers
Large diversity of magnetic phases in two-dimensional magnets with spin-orbit coupling and superconductivity
similarity 0.87Jannis Neuhaus-Steinmetz et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.08551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of Triplet Correlations in Superconductor/Half Metallic Nanojunctions with Spin Active Interfaces
similarity 0.87Klaus Halterman & Oriol T. Valls · 2009 · arXiv:0907.2688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Translational symmetry breaking in two-dimensional antiferromagnets and superconductors
similarity 0.86Subir Sachdev & Matthias Vojta · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910231
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Type II t-J model and shared antiferromagnetic spin coupling from Hund's rule in superconducting LaNiO
similarity 0.86Hanbit Oh & Ya-Hui Zhang · 2023 · arXiv:2307.15706
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin and orbital Edelstein effect in spin-orbit coupled noncentrosymmetric superconductor
similarity 0.86Satoshi Ando et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.08151
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three dimensional generalization of the - Heisenberg model on a square lattice and role of the interlayer coupling
similarity 0.86Michael Holt et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.5551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified