Conductivity sum rule, implication for in-plane dynamics and c-axis response
Wonkee Kim, J. P. Carbotte
arXiv:cond-mat/0007492 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.8661 · 2000-07-29 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently observed $c$-axis optical sum rule violations indicate non-Fermi liquid in-plane behavior. For coherent $c$-axis coupling, the observed flat, nearly frequency independent $c$-axis conductivity $σ_{1}(ω)$ implies a large in-plane scattering rate $Γ$ around $(0,π)$ and therefore any pseudogap that might form at low frequency in the normal state will be smeared. On the other hand incoherent $c$-axis coupling places no restriction on the value of $Γ$ and gives a more consistent picture of the observed sum rule violation which, we find in some cases, can be less than half.
Similar papers
C-axis Response of a High-T_{c} Superconductor with D-Density Wave Order
similarity 0.90Wonkee Kim et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106594
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
c-axis optical sum in underdoped superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.90J. P. Carbotte & E. Schachinger
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interlayer coupling and the c-axis quasiparticle transport in high- cuprates
similarity 0.89Wonkee Kim & J. P. Carbotte · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010314
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductivity sum rule; comparison of coherent and incoherent c-axis coupling
similarity 0.88Wonkee Kim & J. P. Carbotte · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0003132
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterizing two-dimensional superconductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits
similarity 0.88Pavel E. Dolgirev et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sum Rule Anomaly from Suppression of Inelastic Scattering in the Superconducting State
similarity 0.88Frank Marsiglio · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified