Kondo effect in Normal-Superconductor Quantum Dots
J. C. Cuevas, A. Levy Yeyati, A. Martin-Rodero
arXiv:cond-mat/0009112 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.094515 · 2000-09-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the transport properties of a quantum dot coupled to a normal and a superconducting lead. The dot is represented by a generalized Anderson model. Correlation effects are taken into account by an appropriate self-energy which interpolates between the limits of weak and strong coupling to the leads. The transport properties of the system are controlled by the interplay between the Kondo effect and Andreev reflection processes. We show that, depending on the parameters range the conductance can either be enhanced or suppressed as compared to the normal case. In particular, by adequately tunning the coupling to the leads one can reach the maximum value $4e^2/h$ for the conductance.
Similar papers
Kondo effect in normal-superconductor quantum dots
similarity 0.91J. C. Cuevas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Dot in the Kondo Regime coupled to p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.91T. Aono et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212261
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a single C60 transistor
similarity 0.91C. B. Winkelmann et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0908.3638
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
pi-Junction behavior and Andreev bound states in Kondo quantum dots with superconducting leads
similarity 0.91Gabriel Sellier et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-equilibrium dynamics of Andreev states in the Kondo regime
similarity 0.91A. Levy Yeyati et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310554
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson versus Kondo coupling in a quantum dot connected to two superconductors
similarity 0.91Gabriele Campagnano et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406021
Source status unknown — claims are unverified