Glassy Spin Freezing and NMR Wipeout Effect in the High-T_c Superconductor La1.90Sr0.10CuO4: What is the Relationship With Stripes ?
M. -H. Julien, A. Campana, A. Rigamonti, P. Carretta, F. Borsa, P. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, W. G. Moulton, M. Horvatic, C. Berthier, A. Vietkin, A. Revcolevschi
arXiv:cond-mat/0010362 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.144508 · 2000-10-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on 139La and 63Ccu NMR/NQR measurements in the high-Tc superconductor La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 with Tc=26.5 K. Spin fluctuations probed by 139La spin-lattice relaxation (T1), continuously slow down on cooling through Tc. We argue that spin-freezing and superconductivity are bulk effects in this sample. Thus, both phenomena have to coexist microscopically. The distribution of 139La T1 values at low temperature reveals a wide spread of spin fluctuation frequencies in CuO2 planes. A simple estimate shows that Cu nuclei at sites where electronic fluctuations are the slowest are not observable because of too short relaxation times (wipeout effect). This means that the Cu NQR wipeout, observed in this sample, can be explained primarily by slow magnetic, rather than charge, fluctuations. This result does not rule out the connection between wipeout effect and charge stripe order [Hunt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4300 (1999)], but it indicates that the relationship between both phenomena is not straightforward. We argue that the wipeout fraction cannot define a proper order parameter for a stripe phase, and cannot be used alone as a criterion for its existence.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Glassy spin freezing and NMR wipeout effect in the high-Tc superconductor La1.90Sr0.10CuO4: Critical discussion of the role of stripes
similarity 0.91M.-H. Julien et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Segregation, Cluster Spin Glass, and Superconductivity in La1.94Sr0.06CuO4
similarity 0.91M.-H. Julien et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin dynamics and ordering of a cuprate stripe-antiferromagnet
similarity 0.90G. B. Teitel'baum et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Freezing of anisotropic spin clusters in La1.98Sr0.02CuO4
similarity 0.89M. Matsuda et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
(63)Cu NQR Evidence for Spatial Variation of Hole Concentration in La(2-x)Sr(x)CuO(4)
similarity 0.89P. M. Singer et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108291
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Similarity of slow stripe fluctations between Sr-doped cuprates and oxygen-doped nickelates
similarity 0.89I. M. Abu-Shiekah et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified