← Back to search

Tunneling conductance of SIN junctions with different gap symmetries and non-magnetic impurities by direct solution of real-axis Eliashberg equations

G. A. Ummarino, R. S. Gonnelli, D. Daghero

arXiv:cond-mat/0011472 · DOI 10.1016/S0921-4534(01)01205-9 · 2000-11-28 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications

T35 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We theoretically investigate the effect of various symmetries of the superconducting order parameter Delta(omega) on the normalized tunneling conductance of SIN junctions by directly solving the real-axis Eliashberg equations (EEs) for a half-filled infinite band, with the simplifying assumption mu*=0. We analyze six different symmetries of the order parameter: s, d, s+id, s+d, extended s and anisotropic s, by assuming that the spectral function alpha^{2}F(Omega) contains an isotropic part alpha^{2}F(Omega)_{is} and an anisotropic one, alpha^{2}F(Omega)_{an}, such that alpha^{2}F(Omega)_{an} = g alpha^{2}F(Omega)_{is}, where g is a constant. We compare the resulting conductance curves at T=2 K to those obtained by analytical continuation of the imaginary-axis solution of the EEs, and we show that the agreement is not equally good for all symmetries. Then, we discuss the effect of non-magnetic impurities on the theoretical tunneling conductance curves at T=4 K for all the symmetries considered. Finally, as an example, we apply our calculations to the case of optimally-doped high-T_{c} superconductors (HTSC). Surprisingly, although the possibility of explaining the very complex phenomenology of HTSC is probably beyond the limits of the Eliashberg theory, the comparison of the theoretical curves calculated at T=4 K with the experimental ones obtained in various optimally-doped copper-oxides gives fairly good results.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

93Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

93Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

91Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

91Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

97Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

143Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers