Vortex Charging Effect in a Chiral $p_x\pm i p_y$-Wave Superconductor
Masashige Matsumoto, Rolf Heeb
arXiv:cond-mat/0101155 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.014504 · 2001-01-11 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quasiparticle states around a single vortex in a $p_x\pm i p_y$-wave superconductor are studied on the basis of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) theory, where both charge and current screenings are taken into account. Due to the violation of time reversal symmetry, there are two types of vortices which are distinguished by their winding orientations relative to the angular momentum of the chiral Cooper pair. The BdG solution shows that the charges of the two types of vortices are quite different, reflecting the rotating Cooper pair of the $p_x\pm i p_y$-wave paring state.
Similar papers
Lattices of double-quanta vortices and chirality inversion in superconductors
similarity 0.94Julien Garaud et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.03946
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Half-quantum vortices on c-axis domain walls in chiral p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.93Sarah B. Etter et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.00911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is Sr2RuO4 a Chiral P-Wave Superconductor?
similarity 0.92C. Kallin & A. J. Berlinsky · 2009 · arXiv:0902.2170
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle States near the Surface and the Domain Wall in a p_x\pm i p_y-Wave Superconductor
similarity 0.92Masashige Matsumoto & Manfred Sigrist · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9902265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle States near the Surface and the Domain Wall in a p_x \pm i p_y-Wave Superconductor
similarity 0.92Masashige Matsumoto & Manfred Sigrist · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910257
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Neutron scattering studies on spin fluctuations in SrRuO
similarity 0.92K. Jenni et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.06636
Source status unknown — claims are unverified