Phase Separation Models for Cuprate Stripe Arrays
R. S. Markiewicz, C. Kusko
arXiv:cond-mat/0102438 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.064520 · 2001-02-23 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An electronic phase separation model provides a natural explanation for a large variety of experimental results in the cuprates, including evidence for both stripes and larger domains, and a termination of the phase separation in the slightly overdoped regime, when the average hole density equals that on the charged stripes. Several models are presented for charged stripes, showing how density waves, superconductivity, and strong correlations compete with quantum size effects (QSEs) in narrow stripes. The energy bands associated with the charged stripes develop in the middle of the Mott gap, and the splitting of these bands can be understood by considering the QSE on a single ladder.
Similar papers
White-Scalapino-like Stripes in a Mean-Field Hubbard Model
similarity 0.90C. Kusko & R. S. Markiewicz · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102440
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phase coherence in striped cuprates
similarity 0.89Antonio H. Castro Neto · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702180
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting charge-ordered states in cuprates
similarity 0.89Matthias Vojta · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin dynamics in the stripe phase of the cuprates
similarity 0.89Brian M. Andersen & Per Hedegard · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411065
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Cuprate Pseudogap: Competing Order Parameters or Precursor Superconductivity
similarity 0.89Jelena Stajic et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0205497
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-Phase shift across stripes in a charge density wave system
similarity 0.89Tao Ying et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.11639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified