Superconductivity of Rb$_3$C$_{60}$: breakdown of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory
E. Cappelluti, C. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero, S. Strässler, G. A. Ummarino
arXiv:cond-mat/0104457 · DOI 10.1007/PL00011123 · 2001-04-24 · The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this paper, through an exhaustive analysis within the Migdal-Eliashberg theory, we show the incompatibility of experimental data of Rb$_3$C$_{60}$ with the basic assumptions of the standard theory of superconductivity. For different models of the electron-phonon spectral function $α^2F(Ω)$ we solve numerically the Eliashberg equations to find which values of the electron-phonon coupling $λ$, of the logarithmic phonon frequency $Ω_{ln}$ and of the Coulomb pseudopotential $μ^*$ reproduce the experimental data of Rb$_3$C$_{60}$. We find that the solutions are essentially independent of the particular shape of $α^2F(Ω)$ and that, to explain the experimental data of Rb$_3$C$_{60}$, one has to resort to extremely large couplings: $λ=3.0\pm 0.8$. This results differs from the usual partial analyses reported up to now and we claim that this value exceeds the maximum allowed $λ$ compatible with the crystal lattice stability. Moreover, we show quantitatively that the obtained values of $λ$ and $Ω_{ln}$ strongly violate Migdal's theorem and consequently are incompatible with the Migdal-Eliashberg theory. One has therefore to consider the generalization of the theory of superconductivity in the nonadiabatic regime to account for the experimental properties of fullerides.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rb3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Failure of the Migdal-Eliashberg Theory of Superconductivity in Rb_3C_60
similarity 0.91C. Grimaldi et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0006398
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonadiabatic Pauli susceptibility in fullerene compounds
similarity 0.91E. Cappelluti et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104108
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling the Unconventional Superconducting Properties of Expanded AC Fullerides
similarity 0.90M. Capone et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0809.0910
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Tc superconductivity above 130 K in cubic MH4 compounds at ambient pressure
similarity 0.90Xinxin Li et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.04222
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonadiabatic theory of the superconducting state
similarity 0.90M. Botti et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chern-Simons Modified-RPA Eliashberg Theory of the nu=1/2+1/2 Quantum Hall Bilayer
similarity 0.90Tevž Lotrič & Steven H. Simon · 2023 · arXiv:2309.08329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified