Phase transitions in the mesoscopic superconducting square
J. Bonca, V. V. Kabanov
arXiv:cond-mat/0106212 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.012509 · 2001-06-12 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We solve the Ginzburg-Landau equation (GLE) for the mesoscopic thin film of the square shape in the magnetic field. In the limit of Ginzburg-Landau parameter $κ\to \infty$ we find a series of first and second order phase transitions as temperature and/or magnetic field changes. First order phase transitions between giant flux states can be described with a simple variational procedure. We discuss the similarity with rotating liquid $He^4$ and derive a simple formula for $H_{c1}$. We identify order parameters based on symmetry arguments and we propose Landau functional describing the second order phase transition.
Similar papers
Phase transitions in the mesoscopic superconducting square
similarity 0.93J. Bonča & V. V. Kabanov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-antivortex configurations and their stability in mesoscopic superconducting square
similarity 0.92T. Mertelj & V. V. Kabanov · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212274
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dependence of the vortex configuration on the geometry of mesoscopic flat samples
similarity 0.89B. J. Baelus & F. M. Peeters · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106601
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic response in dipole superfluids: vortex lattices and singular domain walls
similarity 0.89Kazuki Yamamoto et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.16685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic superconductivity
similarity 0.89David Möckli & Murilo Kessler de Azambuja · 2024 · arXiv:2405.12298
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mesoscopic superconductors in the London limit: equilibrium properties and metastability
similarity 0.89E. Akkermans et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0008289
Source status unknown — claims are unverified