← Back to search

Comment on ``New Vortex-Matter Size Effect Observed in Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$"

Y. Kopelevich, P. Esquinazi

arXiv:cond-mat/0107087 · 2001-07-04 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T2theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The Letter of Wang et al. \cite{wan} is related to the recently discovered vanishing of the second magnetization peak (SMP) in high-$T_c$ superconductors reducing the sample size \cite{kope1,kope2,gal}. This phenomenon has been interpreted \cite{kope1,kope2,gal} in terms of thermomagnetic instability (TMI) effects. The TMI approach has also been adopted by Wang et al. in their previous work \cite{wan2} on the critical sample size temperature dependence $R_{cr}(T)$ measured in Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$ (Bi2212) single crystals. In contrast, in the recently published Letter \cite{wan} the authors claimed that the $R_{cr}(T)$ obtained for Bi2212 crystals is at odds with the TMI model and proposed an alternative explanation of the results assuming that the SMP vanishes as the sample width (or diameter) becomes smaller than the in-plane vortex correlation length $R_c^{2D}(T) \sim J_c(T)^{-1/2}$, where $J_c(T)$ is the critical current density. We demonstrate below that the authors conclusion is misleading.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

87Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.2Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers