← Back to search

Temperature and junction-type dependency of Andreev reflection in MgB2

R. S. Gonnelli, A. Calzolari, D. Daghero, G. A. Ummarino, V. A. Stepanov, P. Fino, G. Giunchi, S. Ceresara, G. Ripamonti

arXiv:cond-mat/0107239 · DOI 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00229-9 · 2001-07-11 · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

T2theoretical12 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We studied the voltage and temperature dependency of the dynamic conductance of normal metal-MgB2 junctions obtained either with the point-contact technique (with Au and Pt tips) or by making Ag-paint spots on the surface of high-quality single-crystal-like MgB2 samples. The fit of the conductance curves with the generalized BTK model gives evidence of pure s-wave gap symmetry. The temperature dependency of the gap, measured in Ag-paint junctions (dirty limit), follows the standard BCS curve with 2Delta/kTc = 3.3. In out-of-plane, high-pressure point contacts we obtained almost ideal Andreev reflection characteristics showing a single small s-wave gap Delta = 2.6 +/- 0.2 (clean limit). These results support the two-gap model of superconductivity, the presence of a modified layer at the surface of the crystals and an important and non-conventional role of the impurities in MgB2.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38.8Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

34.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers