Spatial fluctuations of the pairing potential in disordered superconductors
G. Litak
arXiv:cond-mat/0108330 · DOI 10.1016/S0921-4534(01)01060-7 · 2001-08-21 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the effect of site diagonal, non-magnetic, disorder on the a pairing amplitude in an extended Hubbard model with the intersite attraction. Analyzing fluctuations of a pairing potential we discuss the instability of mixed solutions, 's+d' and 's+id', in presence of disorder. The influence of disorder on extended s- and d-wave superconductors appear to be comparable but in certain regions of the phase diagram, even weak disorder can change the symmetry of the order parameter.
Similar papers
Interorbital pair scattering in clean and impure superconductors
similarity 0.91Anna Ciechan & Karol I. Wysokinski · 2009 · arXiv:0909.0937
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spatial Fluctuations of the Order Parameter in P-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.91G. Litak · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0112485
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-phonon pairing mechanism: cuprates with high value of the critical temperature
similarity 0.91R. Szczęśniak & A. P. Durajski · 2012 · arXiv:1206.5531
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
CDMFT+HFD : an extension of dynamical mean field theory for nonlocal interactions applied to the single band extended Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Sarbajaya Kundu & David Sénéchal · 2023 · arXiv:2310.16075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Particle Density of States of a Superconductor with a Spatially Varying Gap and Phase Fluctuations
similarity 0.90Daniel Valdez-Balderas & David Stroud · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity with Finite-Momentum Pairing in Zero Magnetic Field
similarity 0.90Florian Loder et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.4345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified