Thermally generated vortices, gauge invariance and electron spectral function in the pseudo-gap regime
Jinwu Ye
arXiv:cond-mat/0109507 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.227003 · 2001-09-27 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Starting from classical vortex fluctuation picture, we study the single electron properties in the pseudogap regime. We show that it is the gauge invariant Green function of spinon which is directly related to ARPES data in the pseudogap regime instead of the non-gauge invariant one. We find that the random gauge field from the thermally generated vortices completely destroys the coherent spinon motion and leads to excitations pertinent to non-Fermi liquid behaviors. The Energy Distribution Curves (EDC) show broad peaks, while the Momentum Distribution Curve (MDC) show sharp peaks with Lorenz form. The local density of state at zero energy scales as the inverse of Kosterlize-Thouless length. These results are qualitatively consistent with the ARPES data in the pseudo-gap regime.
Similar papers
The Unusual Superconducting State of Underdoped Cuprates
similarity 0.91Patrick A. Lee & Xiao-Gang Wen · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle Nernst effect in the cuprate superconductors from the d-density wave theory of the pseudogap phase
similarity 0.91Chuanwei Zhang et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.1966
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
d_{x^2-y^2}-Wave Pairing Fluctuations and Pseudo Spin Gap in Two-Dimensional Electron Systems
similarity 0.90Shigeki Onoda & Masatoshi Imada · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9903030
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a Toy Model of the Pseudogap State
similarity 0.89E. Z. Kuchinskii & M. V. Sadovskii · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910261
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprates phase diagram deduced from magnetic susceptibility: what is the `true' pseudogap line?
similarity 0.89Yves Noat et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.02589
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and spectral function from superconducting fluctuations to the bosonic limit
similarity 0.89A. Perali et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202084
Source status unknown — claims are unverified