Competition between spin exchange and correlated hopping
Y. Saiga, M. Imada
arXiv:cond-mat/0110458 · DOI 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00037-9 · 2001-10-22 · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The ground-state phase diagram is numerically studied for an electronic model consisting of the spin exchange term (J) and the correlated hopping term (t_3: the three-site term). This model has no single-particle hopping and the ratio of the two terms is controlled by a parameter α\equiv 4 t_3 / J. The case of α=1 corresponds to complete suppression of single-particle hopping in the strong-coupling limit of the Hubbard model. In one dimension, phase separation takes place below a critical value α_c = 0.36-0.63 which depends on the electron density. Spin gap opens in the whole region except the phase-separated one. For α\gsim 1.2 and low hole densities, charge-density-wave correlations are the most dominant, whereas singlet-pairing correlations are the most dominant in the remaining region. The possibility of superconductivity in the two-dimensional case is also discussed, based on equal-time pairing correlations.
Similar papers
Interplay of Superconductivity and Spin-Dependent Disorder
similarity 0.90Ravindra Nanguneri et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity: the role of kinetic interactions, kinetic correlations, and external pressure
similarity 0.89Grzegorz Górski et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.2774
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kinematic spin-fluctuation mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.89Nikolay M. Plakida & Viktor S. Oudovenko · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4934
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unveiling the Interplay of Charge and Magnetic Excitations in HgBaCaCuO
similarity 0.89Karn Rongrueangkul et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.11524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux phase, Néel antiferromagnetism, and superconductivity in the t-J model
similarity 0.89I. S. Sandalov & M. Richter
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the Two-Orbital Hubbard Model of Infinite-Layer Nickelates
similarity 0.89Zhihui Luo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.12250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified