← Back to search

An Intrinsic Tendency of Electronic Phase Separation into Two Superconducting States in La(2-x)Sr(x)CuO(4+delta)

B. Lorenz, Z. G. Li, T. Honma, P. -H. Hor

arXiv:cond-mat/0111023 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144522 · 2001-11-01 · Physical Review B

T331 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The effect of hydrostatic pressure up to 2 GPa on the superconductiong transitions in La{2-x}Sr{x}CuO{4+delta} is investigated. The ambient and high pressure properties of two series of samples with x=0 and x=0.015 and 0<delta<0.1 are characterized and compared by ac-susceptibility measurements. At ambient pressure both sets of samples fit into the same phase diagram as a function of the total hole concentration, n_h. For n_h<0.085 there is a single superconducting transition (T_{c} approx 30 K) with an unusually large pressure coefficient, dT_c{30}/dp approx 10K/GPa. At higher hole density (n_h>0.085) a second superconducting transition (T_{c} approx 15 K) follows the first transition upon cooling and the pressure shift of this transition is negative, dT_c{15}/dp approx -4 K/GPa. At the boundary as the hole density is close to 0.085 the phase separation can be induced by pressure. The results are explained in terms of a strong correlation of the interstitial oxygen with the hole system in the CuO-planes. Pressure, applied at ambient temperature, causes a redistribution of holes. The mobile oxygen dopants follow and enhance T_c as well as the tendency to phase separation. If pressure is changed at low temperature (<100 K) the effects on T_c and phase separations are greatly diminished because the interstitial oxygen becomes immobile at low T. Our results indicate that the dopant effects are important. Dopants and holes should be treated as a single globally correlated state. When thermodynamic euqilibrium is achieved in the soft-doping samples, we find that there is an intrinsic tendency of electronic phase separation of doped holes into two distinct superconducting states.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure unresolvedunknown
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure unresolvedunknown
La2CuO4.04

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4.027

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La2CuO4.108

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure unresolvedunknown
La2CuO4.108

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4.061

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure unresolvedunknown
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4.061

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure unresolvedonset
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4.04

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.985Sr0.015CuO4.04

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers