Zeeman effects on the impurity-induced resonances in d-wave superconductors
C. Grimaldi
arXiv:cond-mat/0111554 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.094502 · 2001-11-29 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It is shown how the resonant states induced by a single spinless impurity in a d-wave superconductor evolve under the effect of an applied Zeeman magnetic field. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the spin-orbit coupling to the impurity potential can have important and characteristic effects on the resonant states and their response to the Zeeman field, especially when the impurity is close to the unitary limit. For zero or very small spin-orbit interaction, the resonant states becomes Zeeman splitted by the magnetic field while when the spin-orbit coupling is important, new low-lying resonances arise which do not show any Zeeman splitting.
Similar papers
Spin-orbit scattering in d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90C. Grimaldi · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9905262
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of magnetic impurities on charge transport in diffusive-normal-metal / superconductor junctions
similarity 0.90T. Yokoyama et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406745
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of impurities in noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.90K. V. Samokhin · 2010 · arXiv:1002.4639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonance phenomena in asymmetric superconducting quantum interference devices
similarity 0.90T. P. Polak & E. Sarnelli · 2007 · arXiv:0707.4395
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modification of Born impurity scattering near the surface of d-wave superconductors and influence of external magnetic field
similarity 0.90A. Zare et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.4453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reentrant Superconductivity in Zeeman Fields
similarity 0.89Tomoya Sano et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.14507
Source status unknown — claims are unverified