← Back to search

Origin for the enhanced copper spin echo decay rate in the pseudogap regime of the multilayer high-T_c cuprates

Atsushi Goto, W. G. Clark, Patrik Vonlanthen, Kenji B. Tanaka, Tadashi Shimizu, Kenjiro Hashi, P. V. P. S. S. Sastry, Justin Schwartz

arXiv:cond-mat/0201244 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.127002 · 2002-01-15 · Physical review letters

T3experimental6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report measurements of the anisotropy of the spin echo decay for the inner layer Cu site of the triple layer cuprate, Hg_0.8Re_0.2Ba_2Ca_2Cu_3O_8 (T_c=126 K) in the pseudogap T regime below T_pg ~ 170 K and the corresponding analysis for their interpretation. As the field alignment is varied, the shape of the decay curve changes from Gaussian (H_0 \parallel c) to single exponential (H_0 \perp c). The latter characterizes the decay caused by the fluctuations of adjacent Cu nuclear spins caused by their interactions with electron spins. The angular dependence of the second moment (T_{2M}^{-2} \equiv <Δω^2>) deduced from the decay curves indicates that T_{2M}^{-2} for H_0 \parallel c, which is identical to T_{2G}^{-2} (T_{2G} is the Gaussian component), is substantially enhanced, as seen in the pseudogap regime of the bilayer systems. Comparison of T_{2M}^{-2} between H_0 \parallel c and H_0 \perp c indicates that this enhancement is caused by electron spin correlations between the inner and the outer CuO_2 layers. These results provide the answer to the long-standing controversy regarding the opposite T dependences of (T_1T)^{-1} and T_{2G}^{-2} in the pseudogap regime of bi- and trilayer systems.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Hg0.8Re0.2Ba2Ca2Cu3O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

126Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers