Josephson Plasma in RuSr2GdCu2O8
H. Shibata
arXiv:cond-mat/0204070 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.180507 · 2002-04-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Josephson plasma in RuSr$_{2}$GdCu$_{2}$O$_{8}$, Ru$_{1-x}$Sr$_{2}$GdCu$_{2+x}$O$_{8}$ (x = 0.3), and RuSr$_{2}$Eu$_{2-x}$Ce$_{x}$Cu$_{2}$O$_{10}$ (x = 0.5) compounds is investigated by the sphere resonance method. The Josephson plasma is observed in a low-frequency region (around 8.5 cm$^{-1}$ at T $\ll$ $T_{c}$) for ferromagnetic RuSr$_{2}$GdCu$_{2}$O$_{8}$, while it increases to 35 cm$^{-1}$ for non-ferromagnetic Ru$_{1-x}$Sr$_{2}$GdCu$_{2+x}$O$_{8}$ (x = 0.3), which represents a large reduction in the Josephson coupling at ferromagnetic RuO$_{2}$ block layers. The temperature dependence of the plasma does not shift to zero frequency ({\it i.e.} $j_{c}$ = 0) at low temperatures, indicating that there is no transition from the 0-phase to the $π$-phase in these compounds. The temperature dependence and the oscillator strength of the peak are different from those of other non-magnetic cuprates, and the origins of these anomalies are discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 53 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ru1-xSr2GdCu2+xO8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 64 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ru1-xSr2GdCu2+xO8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 56 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| RuSr2Eu2-xCexCu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 54 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2Eu2-xCexCu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 46 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Josephson plasma in RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.90H. Shibata
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a Bulk Meissner State in RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.88C. W. Chu et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson surface plasmons in spatially confined cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88Filippo Alpeggiani & Lucio Claudio Andreani · 2013 · arXiv:1305.4579
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double Josephson Plasma Resonance in T* Phase SmLa1−xSrxCuO4−δ
similarity 0.88H. Shibata & T. Yamada
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Plasma Resonance in High Temperature Superconductors: A Test of Interlayer Tunneling Theory
similarity 0.87Sudip Chakravarty · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9703140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two Phase Collective Modes in Josephson Vortex Lattice in Intrinsic Josephson Junction BiSrCaCuO
similarity 0.87I. Kakeya et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified