Evolution of the resistivity anisotropy in Bi_{2}Sr_{2-x}La_{x}CuO_{6+δ} single crystals for a wide range of hole doping
S. Ono, Yoichi Ando
arXiv:cond-mat/0205305 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.104512 · 2002-05-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
To elucidate how the temperature dependence of the resistivity anisotropy of the cuprate superconductors changes with hole doping, both the in-plane and the out-of-plane resistivities (ρ_{ab} and ρ_{c}) are measured in a series of high-quality Bi_{2}Sr_{2-x}La_{x}CuO_{6+δ} (BSLCO) single crystals for a wide range of x (x = 0.23 - 1.02), which corresponds to the hole doping per Cu, p, of 0.03 - 0.18. The anisotropy ratio, ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab}, shows a systematic increase with decreasing p at moderate temperatures, except for the most underdoped composition where the localization effect enhances ρ_{ab} and thus lowers ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab}. The exact p dependence of ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab} at a fixed temperature is found to be quite peculiar, which is discussed to be due to the effect of the pseudogap that causes ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab} to be increasingly more enhanced as p is reduced. The pseudogap also causes a rapid growth of ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab} with decreasing temperature, and, as a result, the ρ_{c}/ρ_{ab} value almost reaches 10^6 in underdoped samples just above T_c. Furthermore, it is found that the temperature dependence of ρ_{c} of underdoped samples show two distinct temperature regions in the pseudogap phase, which suggests that the divergence of ρ_{c} below the pseudogap temperature is governed by two different mechanisms.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr1.77La0.23CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.77La0.23CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr1.61La0.39CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.61La0.39CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr1.51La0.49CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.51La0.49CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr1.34La0.66CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.34La0.66CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr1.27La0.73CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.27La0.73CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr1.16La0.84CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.4 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Bi2Sr1.16La0.84CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.4 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
c-Axis Transport and Resistivity Anisotropy of Lightly- to Moderately-Doped La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4} Single Crystals: Implications on the Charge Transport Mechanism
similarity 0.90Seiki Komiya et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0203107
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
c-axis transport and phenomenology of the pseudo-gap state in
similarity 0.89M. Giura et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407403
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal scaling behavior of the c-axis resistivity of high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.89Y. H. Su et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal growth and anisotropic transport properties of high-Tc superconductors Bi2Sr2Can-1CunO2n+4+d (n = 2, 3)
similarity 0.88Takao Watanabe et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hidden Order in the Cuprates
similarity 0.88S. Chakravarty et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0005443
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel anisotropy in the superconducting gap structure of Bi_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8+δ} probed by quasiparticle heat transport
similarity 0.88Yoichi Ando et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0203106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified